Sean Diddy Combs Filmed Inappropriate Tapes With 3 Different A List Celebs Lawyer Claims

Continuing to share more details about what her client experienced at Sean “Diddy” Combs’ parties, attorney Ariel Mitchell-Kidd claims she was told there were inappropriate videos involving three A-list celebrities.

Mitchell-Kidd, who is representing adult entertainer Adria Sheri English, revealed the latest information during her appearance on NewsNation’s Banfield.

“The individuals who contacted me purported to have three different tapes with three different celebrities, including Diddy” she claimed. “And then a fourth celebrity without Diddy but in a compromising situation with someone.” 

The attorney also stated it is believed that the person in the rumored fourth video was recorded at one of Sean “Diddy” Combs’ homes. She did point out that the other three individuals were reportedly “A-list celebrities.”

Mitchell-Kidd then admitted she had not seen some of the tapes in question. “I can’t attest to whether or not they exist or not,” she stated. “I just was told initially that ‘they’ own this treasure trove of videos, so I have to believe that there are a lot of celebrities who know what they did.”

Mitchell-Kidd’s client previously filed a lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs for sex trafficking in July. She claimed the rap mogul forced her to have sexual intercourse with famed jeweler Jacob Arabov. She also claimed in her lawsuit that she was expected to be “passed off” to other people. 

The Attorney Reportedly Attempted to Drop Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Victim as a Client

However, Mitchell-Kidd recently attempted to drop the alleged victim, Adria Sheri English, as a client.

In court documents obtained by USA Today, the lawyer cited “a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship” and “irreconcilable differences” as the reasons why she wished to stop representing English in her lawsuit against Combs.

“As a result of a fundamental disagreement between” the attorneys and English “regarding almost every aspect of the litigation, including settlement demands, causes of actions in the pleadings,” as well as English’s alleged “undermining behavior and questionable antics,” the attorneys say “an irreconcilable conflict and tension has developed,” the motion reads.

Mitchell-Kidd did explain why she made the decision to stop representing English. “We agreed that she would stop undermining me,” she said on Banfield. “Then she went behind my back and violated it again. So fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. That’s where we are.”

Mitchell-Kidd further claimed that she and English had a “tumultuous relationship” and that her client was “undermining” her work.

“If you’re hiring me to do my job as a lawyer, and you undermine me, I’m going to quit,” Mitchell-Kidd said. “I will not stand for anybody, including my client, intending to undermine my work. … had to end the relationship.”